Patients Care and Early Save Program Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Patients Care and Early Save Program. Answer: Yes, I believe that the early save program implemented by the hospital is effective in improving early timely and early recognition of deteriorating clinical conditions in my hospital where I am working. The reason for this conclusion is that looking at the data provided comparing pre early save program to post early save program you will realize that there are improvements in terms of patients that died, transferred to ICU, transferred to HDU as well as those who remained on the general ward. Specifically, 25% of the patients that were in need of early save program but were not subjected to the program died compared to 10% date of all the patients that were subjected to early save program after the innovation was implemented. This shows a reduction of 10% in deaths that occurred when the two phases are compared. (Prokscha, 2012) Another aspect that shows improvement is percentage of patients transferred to Intensive Care Unit. In the pre early save program 35 % of the patients were moved to or transferred to ICU in comparison to 20% of those patients that were transferred to during the post early save program. Putting this in a different perspective, transferring patients to ICU means the patients health was deteriorating meaning there were less patients whose clinical conditions deteriorated during post early save program compared to pre early save program. (Rondel, Varley and Webb, 2012). Although from the data we can see that same percentage of patients were moved to or transferred to HDU for both pre and post early save program this can be attributed to the fact that the level clinical deterioration of the patients were such that it is difficult to improve them through early save program as these are basic steps that only seeks to assist the patient but not detailed and specific medical attention and that these kind of patients were going to need HDU in any case. Comparing patients that remained on ward to those that either were transferred to ICU, HDU or lost their life we can see an improvement of 30% between pre early save program to post early save program, post early save recording 50% remain on ward compared to 20% in pre save program. From the above analysis it can it clear that the early save program both the code blue and the one with medical emergency team are effective in ensuring as many patients are saved as possible as opposed to not having such program in place. (Cerrito and Cerrito, 2010) The data can be used by the hospital to show the hospital has been able to promptly indentify the deteriorating clinical conditions of its patients and that correct measure were taken to save the life of the patient, as stipulated in standard 9 of the NSQHS. The program implemented by my hospital also show reducing percentage of patients whom the hospital had to escalate their conditions to the next level of care between pre early save program to post early save program. The post early save program had less percentage of patients whose conditions had to be escalated. This information can be used by the hospital to train the family members or cares of the patients and have this reported to NSQHS to show how the hospital has been able to achieve this. (Rogers, Randolph and Mastroianni, 2013) References Cerrito, P. and Cerrito, J. (2010).Clinical data mining for physician decision making and investigating health outcomes. Hershey, PA: Medical Information Science Reference. Prokscha, S. (2012).Practical guide to clinical data management. Boca Raton: CRC/Taylor Francis Nursing. Rogers, B., Randolph, S. and Mastroianni, K. (2013).Occupational health nursing guidelines for primary clinical conditions. Rondel, R., Varley, S. and Webb, C. (2012).Clinical data management. Chichester: Wiley.